Patrick Carroll vs Kenneth Goebel
1. LSS WCH P-00020, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (B75).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Patrick Carroll vs Kenneth Goebel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Patrick Carroll (2101)
- Black
- Kenneth Goebel (2180)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 1. LSS WCH P-00020
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (B75)
About this chess game
This chess game between Patrick Carroll (2101) and Kenneth Goebel (2180) was played at 1. LSS WCH P-00020 in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (B75). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Patrick Carroll games or Kenneth Goebel games? This Patrick Carroll vs Kenneth Goebel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Patrick Carroll vs Kenneth Goebel?
Patrick Carroll vs Kenneth Goebel (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Patrick Carroll vs Kenneth Goebel?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (ECO B75).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Patrick Carroll vs Kenneth Goebel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.