Jonathan Carlstedt vs Maximilian Neef
GER, 1.Bundesliga 2014/15 rounds 7-9, 2015 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Classical Variation (C11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jonathan Carlstedt vs Maximilian Neef with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jonathan Carlstedt (2437)
- Black
- Maximilian Neef (2361)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- GER, 1.Bundesliga 2014/15 rounds 7-9
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation (C11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jonathan Carlstedt (2437) and Maximilian Neef (2361) was played at GER, 1.Bundesliga 2014/15 rounds 7-9 in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation (C11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jonathan Carlstedt games or Maximilian Neef games? This Jonathan Carlstedt vs Maximilian Neef encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jonathan Carlstedt vs Maximilian Neef?
Jonathan Carlstedt vs Maximilian Neef (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jonathan Carlstedt vs Maximilian Neef?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation (ECO C11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jonathan Carlstedt vs Maximilian Neef, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.