Curtis Carlson vs Martin Garfinkel
Corr ch4-USA, date unknown · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Curtis Carlson vs Martin Garfinkel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Curtis Carlson (2260)
- Black
- Martin Garfinkel
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Corr ch4-USA
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04)
About this chess game
This chess game between Curtis Carlson (2260) and Martin Garfinkel was played at Corr ch4-USA and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Curtis Carlson games or Martin Garfinkel games? This Curtis Carlson vs Martin Garfinkel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Curtis Carlson vs Martin Garfinkel?
Curtis Carlson vs Martin Garfinkel finished 1–0, a win for Curtis Carlson.
What opening was played in Curtis Carlson vs Martin Garfinkel?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (ECO C04).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Curtis Carlson vs Martin Garfinkel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.