Jan Carlsen vs Richard Mitsuo Fuzishawa
OP-05083, 2021 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jan Carlsen vs Richard Mitsuo Fuzishawa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jan Carlsen (1610)
- Black
- Richard Mitsuo Fuzishawa (2324)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- OP-05083
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jan Carlsen (1610) and Richard Mitsuo Fuzishawa (2324) was played at OP-05083 in 2021 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jan Carlsen games or Richard Mitsuo Fuzishawa games? This Jan Carlsen vs Richard Mitsuo Fuzishawa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jan Carlsen vs Richard Mitsuo Fuzishawa?
Jan Carlsen vs Richard Mitsuo Fuzishawa (2021) finished 1–0, a win for Jan Carlsen.
What opening was played in Jan Carlsen vs Richard Mitsuo Fuzishawa?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jan Carlsen vs Richard Mitsuo Fuzishawa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.