John J Carleton vs Allan Poulsen
WC15 Final, 1996 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay John J Carleton vs Allan Poulsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- John J Carleton (2280)
- Black
- Allan Poulsen (2320)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WC15 Final
- Year
- 1996
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97)
About this chess game
This chess game between John J Carleton (2280) and Allan Poulsen (2320) was played at WC15 Final in 1996 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more John J Carleton games or Allan Poulsen games? This John J Carleton vs Allan Poulsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won John J Carleton vs Allan Poulsen?
John J Carleton vs Allan Poulsen (1996) finished 1–0, a win for John J Carleton.
What opening was played in John J Carleton vs Allan Poulsen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (ECO B97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of John J Carleton vs Allan Poulsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.