Cicero Assuncao Jr Cardoso vs Simael Vieira Barbosa
2010 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Cicero Assuncao Jr Cardoso vs Simael Vieira Barbosa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Cicero Assuncao Jr Cardoso (1884)
- Black
- Simael Vieira Barbosa (1963)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Cicero Assuncao Jr Cardoso (1884) and Simael Vieira Barbosa (1963) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Cicero Assuncao Jr Cardoso games or Simael Vieira Barbosa games? This Cicero Assuncao Jr Cardoso vs Simael Vieira Barbosa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Cicero Assuncao Jr Cardoso vs Simael Vieira Barbosa?
Cicero Assuncao Jr Cardoso vs Simael Vieira Barbosa (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Cicero Assuncao Jr Cardoso vs Simael Vieira Barbosa?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Cicero Assuncao Jr Cardoso vs Simael Vieira Barbosa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.