Marcio De Lucca Cardoso vs Julia Alboredo
2015 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Lundin Variation (D47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcio De Lucca Cardoso vs Julia Alboredo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcio De Lucca Cardoso (1813)
- Black
- Julia Alboredo (2017)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Lundin Variation (D47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcio De Lucca Cardoso (1813) and Julia Alboredo (2017) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Lundin Variation (D47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcio De Lucca Cardoso games or Julia Alboredo games? This Marcio De Lucca Cardoso vs Julia Alboredo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Lundin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcio De Lucca Cardoso vs Julia Alboredo?
Marcio De Lucca Cardoso vs Julia Alboredo (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Marcio De Lucca Cardoso vs Julia Alboredo?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Lundin Variation (ECO D47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcio De Lucca Cardoso vs Julia Alboredo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.