Fabio Capossela vs Francesco Minelli
2008 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fabio Capossela vs Francesco Minelli with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fabio Capossela (1845)
- Black
- Francesco Minelli (1873)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fabio Capossela (1845) and Francesco Minelli (1873) was played in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fabio Capossela games or Francesco Minelli games? This Fabio Capossela vs Francesco Minelli encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fabio Capossela vs Francesco Minelli?
Fabio Capossela vs Francesco Minelli (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Fabio Capossela vs Francesco Minelli?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fabio Capossela vs Francesco Minelli, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.