Carlos Ramon Cantero vs Eleuterio Recalde
Asuncion, 1960 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (E17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Carlos Ramon Cantero vs Eleuterio Recalde with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Carlos Ramon Cantero (1941)
- Black
- Eleuterio Recalde
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Asuncion
- Year
- 1960
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (E17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Carlos Ramon Cantero (1941) and Eleuterio Recalde was played at Asuncion in 1960 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (E17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Carlos Ramon Cantero games or Eleuterio Recalde games? This Carlos Ramon Cantero vs Eleuterio Recalde encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Carlos Ramon Cantero vs Eleuterio Recalde?
Carlos Ramon Cantero vs Eleuterio Recalde (1960) finished 1–0, a win for Carlos Ramon Cantero.
What opening was played in Carlos Ramon Cantero vs Eleuterio Recalde?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (ECO E17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Carlos Ramon Cantero vs Eleuterio Recalde, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.