Rodolfo Cantero vs Jean Ibanez
I CIT Open 2023, 2023 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rodolfo Cantero vs Jean Ibanez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rodolfo Cantero (2078)
- Black
- Jean Ibanez (1830)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- I CIT Open 2023
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rodolfo Cantero (2078) and Jean Ibanez (1830) was played at I CIT Open 2023 in 2023 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rodolfo Cantero games or Jean Ibanez games? This Rodolfo Cantero vs Jean Ibanez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rodolfo Cantero vs Jean Ibanez?
Rodolfo Cantero vs Jean Ibanez (2023) finished 1–0, a win for Rodolfo Cantero.
What opening was played in Rodolfo Cantero vs Jean Ibanez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rodolfo Cantero vs Jean Ibanez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.