Rodolfo Cantero vs Alejandro Benitez Galeano
2015 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (C77).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rodolfo Cantero vs Alejandro Benitez Galeano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rodolfo Cantero (1762)
- Black
- Alejandro Benitez Galeano (1871)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (C77)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rodolfo Cantero (1762) and Alejandro Benitez Galeano (1871) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (C77). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rodolfo Cantero games or Alejandro Benitez Galeano games? This Rodolfo Cantero vs Alejandro Benitez Galeano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rodolfo Cantero vs Alejandro Benitez Galeano?
Rodolfo Cantero vs Alejandro Benitez Galeano (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Rodolfo Cantero vs Alejandro Benitez Galeano?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (ECO C77).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rodolfo Cantero vs Alejandro Benitez Galeano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.