Luis Fernando Cano vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Fernando Cano vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Fernando Cano (2241)
- Black
- Camilo Corredor Castellanos (1921)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Fernando Cano (2241) and Camilo Corredor Castellanos (1921) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Fernando Cano games or Camilo Corredor Castellanos games? This Luis Fernando Cano vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Fernando Cano vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos?
Luis Fernando Cano vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Luis Fernando Cano vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (ECO B44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Fernando Cano vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.