Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Daniel Cabrera Fernandez
2010 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Daniel Cabrera Fernandez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Javier Cano Cabanillas (1960)
- Black
- Daniel Cabrera Fernandez (1778)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Javier Cano Cabanillas (1960) and Daniel Cabrera Fernandez (1778) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Javier Cano Cabanillas games or Daniel Cabrera Fernandez games? This Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Daniel Cabrera Fernandez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Daniel Cabrera Fernandez?
Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Daniel Cabrera Fernandez (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Daniel Cabrera Fernandez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Daniel Cabrera Fernandez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.