Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Rafael Aburto Renovales
2009 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Rafael Aburto Renovales with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Javier Cano Cabanillas (1968)
- Black
- Rafael Aburto Renovales (1541)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Javier Cano Cabanillas (1968) and Rafael Aburto Renovales (1541) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Javier Cano Cabanillas games or Rafael Aburto Renovales games? This Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Rafael Aburto Renovales encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Rafael Aburto Renovales?
Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Rafael Aburto Renovales (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Javier Cano Cabanillas.
What opening was played in Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Rafael Aburto Renovales?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Javier Cano Cabanillas vs Rafael Aburto Renovales, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.