Johan Camilo Cancino vs Laura Camila Velez Alvarez
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation (B72).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Johan Camilo Cancino vs Laura Camila Velez Alvarez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Johan Camilo Cancino (1654)
- Black
- Laura Camila Velez Alvarez (1860)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation (B72)
About this chess game
This chess game between Johan Camilo Cancino (1654) and Laura Camila Velez Alvarez (1860) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation (B72). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Johan Camilo Cancino games or Laura Camila Velez Alvarez games? This Johan Camilo Cancino vs Laura Camila Velez Alvarez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Johan Camilo Cancino vs Laura Camila Velez Alvarez?
Johan Camilo Cancino vs Laura Camila Velez Alvarez (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Johan Camilo Cancino vs Laura Camila Velez Alvarez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation (ECO B72).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Johan Camilo Cancino vs Laura Camila Velez Alvarez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.