Francesco Canals Recasen vs Andres Parreno Cueto
2009 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francesco Canals Recasen vs Andres Parreno Cueto with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francesco Canals Recasen (1918)
- Black
- Andres Parreno Cueto (1790)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francesco Canals Recasen (1918) and Andres Parreno Cueto (1790) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francesco Canals Recasen games or Andres Parreno Cueto games? This Francesco Canals Recasen vs Andres Parreno Cueto encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francesco Canals Recasen vs Andres Parreno Cueto?
Francesco Canals Recasen vs Andres Parreno Cueto (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francesco Canals Recasen vs Andres Parreno Cueto?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francesco Canals Recasen vs Andres Parreno Cueto, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.