Augusto Cesar Campos Jimenez vs Javier Benitez Lozano
2018 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (E17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Augusto Cesar Campos Jimenez vs Javier Benitez Lozano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Augusto Cesar Campos Jimenez (2383)
- Black
- Javier Benitez Lozano (2291)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (E17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Augusto Cesar Campos Jimenez (2383) and Javier Benitez Lozano (2291) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (E17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Augusto Cesar Campos Jimenez games or Javier Benitez Lozano games? This Augusto Cesar Campos Jimenez vs Javier Benitez Lozano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Augusto Cesar Campos Jimenez vs Javier Benitez Lozano?
Augusto Cesar Campos Jimenez vs Javier Benitez Lozano (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Augusto Cesar Campos Jimenez vs Javier Benitez Lozano?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Traditional Variation (ECO E17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Augusto Cesar Campos Jimenez vs Javier Benitez Lozano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.