- Joseph Campbell vs Johnson Michael Basangwa
Corr, 1989 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay - Joseph Campbell vs Johnson Michael Basangwa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- - Joseph Campbell
- Black
- Johnson Michael Basangwa (1615)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Corr
- Year
- 1989
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E80)
About this chess game
This chess game between - Joseph Campbell and Johnson Michael Basangwa (1615) was played at Corr in 1989 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more - Joseph Campbell games or Johnson Michael Basangwa games? This - Joseph Campbell vs Johnson Michael Basangwa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won - Joseph Campbell vs Johnson Michael Basangwa?
- Joseph Campbell vs Johnson Michael Basangwa (1989) finished 1–0, a win for - Joseph Campbell.
What opening was played in - Joseph Campbell vs Johnson Michael Basangwa?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (ECO E80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of - Joseph Campbell vs Johnson Michael Basangwa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.