Nicanor Camino Carrio vs David Perez Bolanos
2019 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nicanor Camino Carrio vs David Perez Bolanos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nicanor Camino Carrio (2004)
- Black
- David Perez Bolanos (1853)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nicanor Camino Carrio (2004) and David Perez Bolanos (1853) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nicanor Camino Carrio games or David Perez Bolanos games? This Nicanor Camino Carrio vs David Perez Bolanos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nicanor Camino Carrio vs David Perez Bolanos?
Nicanor Camino Carrio vs David Perez Bolanos (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Nicanor Camino Carrio vs David Perez Bolanos?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (ECO C67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nicanor Camino Carrio vs David Perez Bolanos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.