Mateus De Camargo vs Paulo Sergio Weber S Bianchi
2010 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mateus De Camargo vs Paulo Sergio Weber S Bianchi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mateus De Camargo (2072)
- Black
- Paulo Sergio Weber S Bianchi (1510)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mateus De Camargo (2072) and Paulo Sergio Weber S Bianchi (1510) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mateus De Camargo games or Paulo Sergio Weber S Bianchi games? This Mateus De Camargo vs Paulo Sergio Weber S Bianchi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mateus De Camargo vs Paulo Sergio Weber S Bianchi?
Mateus De Camargo vs Paulo Sergio Weber S Bianchi (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Mateus De Camargo.
What opening was played in Mateus De Camargo vs Paulo Sergio Weber S Bianchi?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (ECO B17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mateus De Camargo vs Paulo Sergio Weber S Bianchi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.