Marcos Camacho Collados vs Daniel Forcen Esteban
2. Neoclassical Open 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcos Camacho Collados vs Daniel Forcen Esteban with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcos Camacho Collados (2425)
- Black
- Daniel Forcen Esteban (2565)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 2. Neoclassical Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcos Camacho Collados (2425) and Daniel Forcen Esteban (2565) was played at 2. Neoclassical Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcos Camacho Collados games or Daniel Forcen Esteban games? This Marcos Camacho Collados vs Daniel Forcen Esteban encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcos Camacho Collados vs Daniel Forcen Esteban?
Marcos Camacho Collados vs Daniel Forcen Esteban (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Forcen Esteban.
What opening was played in Marcos Camacho Collados vs Daniel Forcen Esteban?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (ECO B17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcos Camacho Collados vs Daniel Forcen Esteban, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.