David Calleja Loma vs Gustavo Robles Vallejo
ESP Ch Abierto, 2006 · Result 1–0 · Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Calleja Loma vs Gustavo Robles Vallejo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Calleja Loma (1635)
- Black
- Gustavo Robles Vallejo (1611)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ESP Ch Abierto
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Calleja Loma (1635) and Gustavo Robles Vallejo (1611) was played at ESP Ch Abierto in 2006 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Calleja Loma games or Gustavo Robles Vallejo games? This David Calleja Loma vs Gustavo Robles Vallejo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Calleja Loma vs Gustavo Robles Vallejo?
David Calleja Loma vs Gustavo Robles Vallejo (2006) finished 1–0, a win for David Calleja Loma.
What opening was played in David Calleja Loma vs Gustavo Robles Vallejo?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Calleja Loma vs Gustavo Robles Vallejo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.