Adriano Caldeira vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo
2019 · Result ½–½ · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Adriano Caldeira vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adriano Caldeira (2156)
- Black
- Leandro Daniel Perdomo (2469)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adriano Caldeira (2156) and Leandro Daniel Perdomo (2469) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adriano Caldeira games or Leandro Daniel Perdomo games? This Adriano Caldeira vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adriano Caldeira vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo?
Adriano Caldeira vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Adriano Caldeira vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (ECO C58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adriano Caldeira vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.