Alessandra Calcagnile vs Angelo Caliolo
Brindisi Provinciale Ch 3rd, 2000 · Result 0–1 · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alessandra Calcagnile vs Angelo Caliolo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alessandra Calcagnile (1582)
- Black
- Angelo Caliolo (1484)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Brindisi Provinciale Ch 3rd
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alessandra Calcagnile (1582) and Angelo Caliolo (1484) was played at Brindisi Provinciale Ch 3rd in 2000 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alessandra Calcagnile games or Angelo Caliolo games? This Alessandra Calcagnile vs Angelo Caliolo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alessandra Calcagnile vs Angelo Caliolo?
Alessandra Calcagnile vs Angelo Caliolo (2000) finished 0–1, a win for Angelo Caliolo.
What opening was played in Alessandra Calcagnile vs Angelo Caliolo?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (ECO C48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alessandra Calcagnile vs Angelo Caliolo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.