Ruben Cajo Esteban vs Alberto Sacristan Latorre
2017 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ruben Cajo Esteban vs Alberto Sacristan Latorre with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ruben Cajo Esteban (1867)
- Black
- Alberto Sacristan Latorre (2075)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ruben Cajo Esteban (1867) and Alberto Sacristan Latorre (2075) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ruben Cajo Esteban games or Alberto Sacristan Latorre games? This Ruben Cajo Esteban vs Alberto Sacristan Latorre encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ruben Cajo Esteban vs Alberto Sacristan Latorre?
Ruben Cajo Esteban vs Alberto Sacristan Latorre (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Ruben Cajo Esteban.
What opening was played in Ruben Cajo Esteban vs Alberto Sacristan Latorre?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ruben Cajo Esteban vs Alberto Sacristan Latorre, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.