Sila Caglar vs Valentina Vainovska
18. ch-EUR Indiv w 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sila Caglar vs Valentina Vainovska with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sila Caglar (2093)
- Black
- Valentina Vainovska (1792)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 18. ch-EUR Indiv w 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sila Caglar (2093) and Valentina Vainovska (1792) was played at 18. ch-EUR Indiv w 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sila Caglar games or Valentina Vainovska games? This Sila Caglar vs Valentina Vainovska encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sila Caglar vs Valentina Vainovska?
Sila Caglar vs Valentina Vainovska (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Sila Caglar.
What opening was played in Sila Caglar vs Valentina Vainovska?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sila Caglar vs Valentina Vainovska, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.