Ryan Wesley da Cost Caetano vs Eduardo Akio Yamamoto
2017 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ryan Wesley da Cost Caetano vs Eduardo Akio Yamamoto with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ryan Wesley da Cost Caetano (1849)
- Black
- Eduardo Akio Yamamoto (2190)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ryan Wesley da Cost Caetano (1849) and Eduardo Akio Yamamoto (2190) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ryan Wesley da Cost Caetano games or Eduardo Akio Yamamoto games? This Ryan Wesley da Cost Caetano vs Eduardo Akio Yamamoto encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ryan Wesley da Cost Caetano vs Eduardo Akio Yamamoto?
Ryan Wesley da Cost Caetano vs Eduardo Akio Yamamoto (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ryan Wesley da Cost Caetano vs Eduardo Akio Yamamoto?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (ECO A83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ryan Wesley da Cost Caetano vs Eduardo Akio Yamamoto, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.