Luís Manuel Cadillon Costa vs Finn Arild Wister
NATT/7, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luís Manuel Cadillon Costa vs Finn Arild Wister with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luís Manuel Cadillon Costa (2342)
- Black
- Finn Arild Wister (1562)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- NATT/7
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luís Manuel Cadillon Costa (2342) and Finn Arild Wister (1562) was played at NATT/7 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luís Manuel Cadillon Costa games or Finn Arild Wister games? This Luís Manuel Cadillon Costa vs Finn Arild Wister encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luís Manuel Cadillon Costa vs Finn Arild Wister?
Luís Manuel Cadillon Costa vs Finn Arild Wister (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Luís Manuel Cadillon Costa vs Finn Arild Wister?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luís Manuel Cadillon Costa vs Finn Arild Wister, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.