Igor Tokuichi Kikuchi Cadilhac vs Carlos Ronquillo Brush
2010 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense (E20).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Igor Tokuichi Kikuchi Cadilhac vs Carlos Ronquillo Brush with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Igor Tokuichi Kikuchi Cadilhac (1698)
- Black
- Carlos Ronquillo Brush (1630)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense (E20)
About this chess game
This chess game between Igor Tokuichi Kikuchi Cadilhac (1698) and Carlos Ronquillo Brush (1630) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense (E20). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Igor Tokuichi Kikuchi Cadilhac games or Carlos Ronquillo Brush games? This Igor Tokuichi Kikuchi Cadilhac vs Carlos Ronquillo Brush encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Igor Tokuichi Kikuchi Cadilhac vs Carlos Ronquillo Brush?
Igor Tokuichi Kikuchi Cadilhac vs Carlos Ronquillo Brush (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Carlos Ronquillo Brush.
What opening was played in Igor Tokuichi Kikuchi Cadilhac vs Carlos Ronquillo Brush?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense (ECO E20).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Igor Tokuichi Kikuchi Cadilhac vs Carlos Ronquillo Brush, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.