Martin Cacheiro Martinez vs Jose Joaquin Ribes Almela
ESP/W/P/096 (ESP), 2017 · Result 1–0 · Amar Opening (A00).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Martin Cacheiro Martinez vs Jose Joaquin Ribes Almela with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Martin Cacheiro Martinez (2004)
- Black
- Jose Joaquin Ribes Almela (2016)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ESP/W/P/096 (ESP)
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Amar Opening (A00)
About this chess game
This chess game between Martin Cacheiro Martinez (2004) and Jose Joaquin Ribes Almela (2016) was played at ESP/W/P/096 (ESP) in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Amar Opening (A00). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Martin Cacheiro Martinez games or Jose Joaquin Ribes Almela games? This Martin Cacheiro Martinez vs Jose Joaquin Ribes Almela encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Amar Opening.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Martin Cacheiro Martinez vs Jose Joaquin Ribes Almela?
Martin Cacheiro Martinez vs Jose Joaquin Ribes Almela (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Martin Cacheiro Martinez.
What opening was played in Martin Cacheiro Martinez vs Jose Joaquin Ribes Almela?
The game opened with the Amar Opening (ECO A00).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Martin Cacheiro Martinez vs Jose Joaquin Ribes Almela, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.