Nelson Cabrera Cabrera vs Marc Roig Roig
2016 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nelson Cabrera Cabrera vs Marc Roig Roig with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nelson Cabrera Cabrera (1489)
- Black
- Marc Roig Roig (1432)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nelson Cabrera Cabrera (1489) and Marc Roig Roig (1432) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nelson Cabrera Cabrera games or Marc Roig Roig games? This Nelson Cabrera Cabrera vs Marc Roig Roig encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nelson Cabrera Cabrera vs Marc Roig Roig?
Nelson Cabrera Cabrera vs Marc Roig Roig (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Nelson Cabrera Cabrera.
What opening was played in Nelson Cabrera Cabrera vs Marc Roig Roig?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (ECO C66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nelson Cabrera Cabrera vs Marc Roig Roig, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.