David Byrne vs Ilya Romanenko
1955 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Modern Main Line (A99).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Byrne vs Ilya Romanenko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Byrne
- Black
- Ilya Romanenko (1082)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 1955
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Modern Main Line (A99)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Byrne and Ilya Romanenko (1082) was played in 1955 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Modern Main Line (A99). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Byrne games or Ilya Romanenko games? This David Byrne vs Ilya Romanenko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Modern Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Byrne vs Ilya Romanenko?
David Byrne vs Ilya Romanenko (1955) finished 1–0, a win for David Byrne.
What opening was played in David Byrne vs Ilya Romanenko?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Modern Main Line (ECO A99).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Byrne vs Ilya Romanenko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.