Lukasz Butkiewicz vs Jakub Zeberski
2014 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lukasz Butkiewicz vs Jakub Zeberski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lukasz Butkiewicz (2429)
- Black
- Jakub Zeberski (2329)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lukasz Butkiewicz (2429) and Jakub Zeberski (2329) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lukasz Butkiewicz games or Jakub Zeberski games? This Lukasz Butkiewicz vs Jakub Zeberski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lukasz Butkiewicz vs Jakub Zeberski?
Lukasz Butkiewicz vs Jakub Zeberski (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Lukasz Butkiewicz vs Jakub Zeberski?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (ECO B67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lukasz Butkiewicz vs Jakub Zeberski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.