Jim Burnett vs Jonathan Hawkins
36. Blackpool Open, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (E59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jim Burnett vs Jonathan Hawkins with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jim Burnett (2160)
- Black
- Jonathan Hawkins (2480)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 36. Blackpool Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (E59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jim Burnett (2160) and Jonathan Hawkins (2480) was played at 36. Blackpool Open in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (E59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jim Burnett games or Jonathan Hawkins games? This Jim Burnett vs Jonathan Hawkins encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jim Burnett vs Jonathan Hawkins?
Jim Burnett vs Jonathan Hawkins (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Jonathan Hawkins.
What opening was played in Jim Burnett vs Jonathan Hawkins?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense (ECO E59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jim Burnett vs Jonathan Hawkins, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.