Irina Bulmaga vs Anca-Otilia Baciu
TCh-ROU w 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Irina Bulmaga vs Anca-Otilia Baciu with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Irina Bulmaga (2387)
- Black
- Anca-Otilia Baciu (2126)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- TCh-ROU w 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Irina Bulmaga (2387) and Anca-Otilia Baciu (2126) was played at TCh-ROU w 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Irina Bulmaga games or Anca-Otilia Baciu games? This Irina Bulmaga vs Anca-Otilia Baciu encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Irina Bulmaga vs Anca-Otilia Baciu?
Irina Bulmaga vs Anca-Otilia Baciu (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Irina Bulmaga.
What opening was played in Irina Bulmaga vs Anca-Otilia Baciu?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (ECO B81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Irina Bulmaga vs Anca-Otilia Baciu, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.