Jaromir Buksa vs Pavel Navratilik
MOR-chT2M 0203, 2003 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaromir Buksa vs Pavel Navratilik with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaromir Buksa (2086)
- Black
- Pavel Navratilik (2055)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- MOR-chT2M 0203
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaromir Buksa (2086) and Pavel Navratilik (2055) was played at MOR-chT2M 0203 in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaromir Buksa games or Pavel Navratilik games? This Jaromir Buksa vs Pavel Navratilik encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaromir Buksa vs Pavel Navratilik?
Jaromir Buksa vs Pavel Navratilik (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Jaromir Buksa.
What opening was played in Jaromir Buksa vs Pavel Navratilik?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaromir Buksa vs Pavel Navratilik, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.