Emil Bukacek vs Svetlana Mednikova
European Senior Teams 2012, 2012 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Emil Bukacek vs Svetlana Mednikova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Emil Bukacek (2181)
- Black
- Svetlana Mednikova (2177)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- European Senior Teams 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Emil Bukacek (2181) and Svetlana Mednikova (2177) was played at European Senior Teams 2012 in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Emil Bukacek games or Svetlana Mednikova games? This Emil Bukacek vs Svetlana Mednikova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Emil Bukacek vs Svetlana Mednikova?
Emil Bukacek vs Svetlana Mednikova (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Emil Bukacek vs Svetlana Mednikova?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (ECO C07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Emil Bukacek vs Svetlana Mednikova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.