Vlastimir Bujisic vs Dario Alivodic
2017 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vlastimir Bujisic vs Dario Alivodic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vlastimir Bujisic (2289)
- Black
- Dario Alivodic (1837)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vlastimir Bujisic (2289) and Dario Alivodic (1837) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vlastimir Bujisic games or Dario Alivodic games? This Vlastimir Bujisic vs Dario Alivodic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vlastimir Bujisic vs Dario Alivodic?
Vlastimir Bujisic vs Dario Alivodic (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Vlastimir Bujisic.
What opening was played in Vlastimir Bujisic vs Dario Alivodic?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (ECO C06).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vlastimir Bujisic vs Dario Alivodic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.