Mateusz Bujalski vs Ziemowit Ossolinski
236. YMCA Winter A 2020, 2021 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mateusz Bujalski vs Ziemowit Ossolinski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mateusz Bujalski (1895)
- Black
- Ziemowit Ossolinski (1887)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 236. YMCA Winter A 2020
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mateusz Bujalski (1895) and Ziemowit Ossolinski (1887) was played at 236. YMCA Winter A 2020 in 2021 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mateusz Bujalski games or Ziemowit Ossolinski games? This Mateusz Bujalski vs Ziemowit Ossolinski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mateusz Bujalski vs Ziemowit Ossolinski?
Mateusz Bujalski vs Ziemowit Ossolinski (2021) finished 1–0, a win for Mateusz Bujalski.
What opening was played in Mateusz Bujalski vs Ziemowit Ossolinski?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mateusz Bujalski vs Ziemowit Ossolinski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.