Gilles Buerki vs Gion Schaefer
58. Biel Rapid Open, 2025 · Result 1–0 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gilles Buerki vs Gion Schaefer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gilles Buerki (1890)
- Black
- Gion Schaefer (1812)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 58. Biel Rapid Open
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gilles Buerki (1890) and Gion Schaefer (1812) was played at 58. Biel Rapid Open in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gilles Buerki games or Gion Schaefer games? This Gilles Buerki vs Gion Schaefer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gilles Buerki vs Gion Schaefer?
Gilles Buerki vs Gion Schaefer (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Gilles Buerki.
What opening was played in Gilles Buerki vs Gion Schaefer?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gilles Buerki vs Gion Schaefer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.