Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno vs Murilo Fanckin
1. AXPG Brazil Open 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno vs Murilo Fanckin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno (1724)
- Black
- Murilo Fanckin (1384)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 1. AXPG Brazil Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno (1724) and Murilo Fanckin (1384) was played at 1. AXPG Brazil Open 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno games or Murilo Fanckin games? This Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno vs Murilo Fanckin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno vs Murilo Fanckin?
Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno vs Murilo Fanckin (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno.
What opening was played in Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno vs Murilo Fanckin?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (ECO A96).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno vs Murilo Fanckin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.