Audrius Budraitis vs Magne Sagafos
Bergen Open, 2000 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Audrius Budraitis vs Magne Sagafos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Audrius Budraitis (2274)
- Black
- Magne Sagafos (2170)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Bergen Open
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Audrius Budraitis (2274) and Magne Sagafos (2170) was played at Bergen Open in 2000 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Audrius Budraitis games or Magne Sagafos games? This Audrius Budraitis vs Magne Sagafos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Audrius Budraitis vs Magne Sagafos?
Audrius Budraitis vs Magne Sagafos (2000) finished 1–0, a win for Audrius Budraitis.
What opening was played in Audrius Budraitis vs Magne Sagafos?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (ECO E83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Audrius Budraitis vs Magne Sagafos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.