Alexandar Budnikov vs Andrzej Szymanski
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandar Budnikov vs Andrzej Szymanski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandar Budnikov (2520)
- Black
- Andrzej Szymanski (2210)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandar Budnikov (2520) and Andrzej Szymanski (2210) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandar Budnikov games or Andrzej Szymanski games? This Alexandar Budnikov vs Andrzej Szymanski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandar Budnikov vs Andrzej Szymanski?
Alexandar Budnikov vs Andrzej Szymanski finished 1–0, a win for Alexandar Budnikov.
What opening was played in Alexandar Budnikov vs Andrzej Szymanski?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandar Budnikov vs Andrzej Szymanski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.