Michael Bucher vs Stefan Kneifel
Zuerich Open, 2001 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System (E98).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Bucher vs Stefan Kneifel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Bucher (2169)
- Black
- Stefan Kneifel (2116)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Zuerich Open
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System (E98)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Bucher (2169) and Stefan Kneifel (2116) was played at Zuerich Open in 2001 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System (E98). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Bucher games or Stefan Kneifel games? This Michael Bucher vs Stefan Kneifel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Bucher vs Stefan Kneifel?
Michael Bucher vs Stefan Kneifel (2001) finished 1–0, a win for Michael Bucher.
What opening was played in Michael Bucher vs Stefan Kneifel?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System (ECO E98).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Bucher vs Stefan Kneifel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.