Lazaro Bruzon Batista vs Rashad Babaev
35. Open, 2008 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (B63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lazaro Bruzon Batista vs Rashad Babaev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lazaro Bruzon Batista (2592)
- Black
- Rashad Babaev (2484)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 35. Open
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (B63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lazaro Bruzon Batista (2592) and Rashad Babaev (2484) was played at 35. Open in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (B63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lazaro Bruzon Batista games or Rashad Babaev games? This Lazaro Bruzon Batista vs Rashad Babaev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lazaro Bruzon Batista vs Rashad Babaev?
Lazaro Bruzon Batista vs Rashad Babaev (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Lazaro Bruzon Batista vs Rashad Babaev?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (ECO B63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lazaro Bruzon Batista vs Rashad Babaev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.