Juergen Brustkern vs Robert Wiedner
2. Bundesliga Ost 2010/11 rounds 3-5, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juergen Brustkern vs Robert Wiedner with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juergen Brustkern (2299)
- Black
- Robert Wiedner (2189)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 2. Bundesliga Ost 2010/11 rounds 3-5
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juergen Brustkern (2299) and Robert Wiedner (2189) was played at 2. Bundesliga Ost 2010/11 rounds 3-5 in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juergen Brustkern games or Robert Wiedner games? This Juergen Brustkern vs Robert Wiedner encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juergen Brustkern vs Robert Wiedner?
Juergen Brustkern vs Robert Wiedner (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juergen Brustkern vs Robert Wiedner?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (ECO E24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juergen Brustkern vs Robert Wiedner, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.