Dinko Brumen vs Anton Bilchinski
TCh-AUT 2. West 2015-16, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dinko Brumen vs Anton Bilchinski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dinko Brumen (2343)
- Black
- Anton Bilchinski (2285)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TCh-AUT 2. West 2015-16
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dinko Brumen (2343) and Anton Bilchinski (2285) was played at TCh-AUT 2. West 2015-16 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dinko Brumen games or Anton Bilchinski games? This Dinko Brumen vs Anton Bilchinski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dinko Brumen vs Anton Bilchinski?
Dinko Brumen vs Anton Bilchinski (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Anton Bilchinski.
What opening was played in Dinko Brumen vs Anton Bilchinski?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (ECO A88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dinko Brumen vs Anton Bilchinski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.