N. Brugman vs Harry Jaspers Focks
Alkmaar Open, 1982 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay N. Brugman vs Harry Jaspers Focks with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- N. Brugman
- Black
- Harry Jaspers Focks
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Alkmaar Open
- Year
- 1982
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65)
About this chess game
This chess game between N. Brugman and Harry Jaspers Focks was played at Alkmaar Open in 1982 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more N. Brugman games or Harry Jaspers Focks games? This N. Brugman vs Harry Jaspers Focks encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won N. Brugman vs Harry Jaspers Focks?
N. Brugman vs Harry Jaspers Focks (1982) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in N. Brugman vs Harry Jaspers Focks?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (ECO E65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of N. Brugman vs Harry Jaspers Focks, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.