Jacob Abildlund Brorsen vs Jacob Carstensen
Amager Klubmesterskab 2011, 2011 · Result ½–½ · Catalan Opening: Open Defense (E04).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacob Abildlund Brorsen vs Jacob Carstensen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacob Abildlund Brorsen (2033)
- Black
- Jacob Carstensen (2332)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Amager Klubmesterskab 2011
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Open Defense (E04)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacob Abildlund Brorsen (2033) and Jacob Carstensen (2332) was played at Amager Klubmesterskab 2011 in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Open Defense (E04). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacob Abildlund Brorsen games or Jacob Carstensen games? This Jacob Abildlund Brorsen vs Jacob Carstensen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Open Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacob Abildlund Brorsen vs Jacob Carstensen?
Jacob Abildlund Brorsen vs Jacob Carstensen (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jacob Abildlund Brorsen vs Jacob Carstensen?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Open Defense (ECO E04).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacob Abildlund Brorsen vs Jacob Carstensen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.