Gottfried Bronn vs Siegmund Kolthoff
2017 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gottfried Bronn vs Siegmund Kolthoff with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gottfried Bronn (1890)
- Black
- Siegmund Kolthoff (2090)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gottfried Bronn (1890) and Siegmund Kolthoff (2090) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gottfried Bronn games or Siegmund Kolthoff games? This Gottfried Bronn vs Siegmund Kolthoff encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gottfried Bronn vs Siegmund Kolthoff?
Gottfried Bronn vs Siegmund Kolthoff (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Siegmund Kolthoff.
What opening was played in Gottfried Bronn vs Siegmund Kolthoff?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (ECO A31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gottfried Bronn vs Siegmund Kolthoff, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.